What you can verify today

Document status: Current public baselineEvidence baseline updated: 2026-08-30Page reviewed: 2026-08-30Owner: Product + Commercial + Data

Reported outcomes are cohort-specific, method-bounded, and include explicit limitations. KPI percentages will not be published without denominator and date-window context.

Verified product proof

CerviGuard artifacts visitors can inspect today

The current public proof set starts with CerviGuard: live workspace access, public implementation context, product screenshots, and the draft MDR self-assessment.

Evidence status

Verified public evidence

SmartClover company and team, CerviGuard and DataGems live products, TealGuard and NIS2COMPASS R&D evidence, repositories, screenshots, and commercial model.

Qualified public evidence

Draft regulatory material, security baseline pages, and methodology notes that require dated context.

Evidence gaps

Clinical outcome percentages, commercial traction metrics, and final regulatory identifiers are not published yet.

Pending metrics

KPI values remain withheld until cohort definitions, denominator rules, and reporting windows are finalized.

Public milestone timeline

2019-2020

First CerviGuard pilot phase

Historical pilot context is summarized here; current public proof starts with the live CerviGuard workspace and product screenshots below.

2022

Research and project track consolidation

Multiple projects and research tracks were finalized before broader platform expansion.

2024

Company launch and platform preparation

Company launch and online product transition are represented by the current public product route, live workspace, and repository links.

2025-2026

Live products and funded R&D expanded

SmartClover launched public CerviGuard and DataGems product surfaces and secured approved non-dilutive consortium R&D financing through TealGuard and NIS2COMPASS.

Pilot context and methodology notes

  • Pilot evidence is currently published through milestone and methodology summaries.
  • Outcome publication requires fixed cohort windows and approved numerator/denominator definitions.
  • Clinicians review AI outputs before confirming follow-up actions.

KPI framework (values pending publication)

KPI nameNumeratorDenominatorCohort windowMethodCaveat
Case review turnaround improvementCases completed inside target review window post-deploymentAll eligible cases in selected cohortPending publicationPre/post cohort comparison with fixed inclusion criteriaWorkflow mix can vary by site
Follow-up adherence upliftCases with completed follow-up within defined intervalCases assigned follow-up actionPending publicationOperational follow-up completion trackingExternal care-path variability applies
AI-assisted triage agreement rateCases where AI support category aligns with clinician final categoryCases containing both AI output and clinician adjudicationPending publicationBlinded adjudication and reconciliation rulesNot a standalone diagnostic-accuracy claim